My Epitaph

If you don't question everything, you will know nothing and believe anything!

Thursday, February 13, 2014

A lesson in critical thinking

Every source has an agenda!

Every source has an agenda, including our subconscious biases, especially our confirmation biases.  The author has their agenda, and it may not always be the same as the publishing house that agrees to put them in print, nor the stores to sell it.  The agendas of the media outlets owned by 6 corporations is to serve the interests of their shareholders and the board of directors elected by those shareholders.  We now know that the 85 wealthiest people own as much wealth as the bottom half, 3.5 Billion people own.  These 85 people own controlling interests in every corporation that can further their personal objectives.  The wealthiest 10,000 probably account for 85% of stocks in those 6 corporations, and they easily stack the directorships with their loyal cronies.  What are their agendas?  What is my agenda, for that matter?  What is your conscious agenda, and can you even acknowledge a single subconscious agenda, like a seemingly frequent use of confirmation bias?  When subconscious agendas, such as trying to avoid cognitive dissonance dominate, like an instinct, over whatever level of consciousness they can demonstrate, especially in jumping straight to confirmation bias without a proverbial "counting to 10," or "sleeping on it," the only way to combat these subconscious biases seems to be knowing we all can demonstrate them from one extreme to the other, and all points between.

I trust that if you have read through this blog you cannot conceive of the notion that my agenda to be similar in direction as that of the corporate media.  CIABCNNBCBS Fox.  Do I have any agenda other than to share the experiences that have helped confer wisdom atop an encyclopedic knowledge?  At least if I do, that shall only be revealed at a cost, to see how I tie "My First 100 Days" together. To help you determine if I have an agenda, other than deconstructing others to expose their agenda, I present the following critique of a fairly new documentary, to demonstrate why the source should be rejected from being accepted as plausible, the documentary can be found by clicking on its title:

The first thing to note is that the production is brought to us by Cutting Edge Ministries.  So, I tried to enter the Christian reality-tunnel as we progressed.  My suspicions that this was a  Christian conspiracy theory was confirmed with the very first words being "The Bible ..."  But, I also know that one can gleam pearls of wisdom even with the most blatantly biased sources ... sometimes you get shown the light in the strangest of places if you look at it right.  So, I plunged further wondering if there were any jewels among the sewage.

4:12  I'd love to ask him if this 6 million number was just the Jews, or why he didn't cite the 10-12 million number claimed of which half were supposed to have been Jewish?  Is he that much a devout Zionist that he doesn't count non-Jews as "people", just as the Talmud would teach?  (Does he recognize his own failure to meet the Talmudic definition of "human"?)  So, we can see more than a touch of Christian Zionism coming through as well as fundamentalist Christian eschatology to further condition those still under that conditioning through the power of repetition of belief within the first five minutes, but still I plugged on (I wish I would have taken notes the first time so I didn't have to subject myself to a second viewing to summarize for The Evolving Door).

One thing the diligent student of history should know is that the racist sentiments of Talmudic Judaism were either adopted to the letter by the National Socialist Democratic Worker's Party (NSDAP), or have - since the defeat of the NSDAP  - been projected upon them by a media that has only gained further Zionist leanings as the media outlets were conglomerated into the 6 corporations that control the flow of information in the west, today (thanks to Bill Clinton signing the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996).  All the racist thoughts spewed around 14 minutes can be found in the Talmud, which confirms to the Jew even more than the Torah that they, indeed, are the "Chosen Ones" and all outsiders are inferior.  There is no firmer foundation for all racist thoughts than "Chosen" mentalities, like the belief the Jews were chosen by YHWH.  The Talmud teaches that only the Jew is human, and the rest of us are all subhuman.  Although many religious Jews seem rarely to be Zionists, and they number among the most vocal opponents against Zionism, the secular Zionists still retain that racist belief that they are somehow chosen over all other humanity, including the Falasha Jews from Ethiopian that have emigrated to Israel.  Even the black Jews born in Israel still face the same racism from the AshkeNAZI Jews that make up about 98% of those calling themselves Jewish in the world.

Pay close attention at 15:00 to see this guy reading off something in trying to make sure the script gets read correctly instead of talking off the cuff from internalized knowledge.  It also seems as though this conspiracy theory is based upon a handful of books, most notably "The Spear of Destiny" and a few other books in the occult vein of NSDAP history.  I once tried to read one of that thread of books in the Indianapolis Public Library from their reference section, but I couldn't get past the errors and flaws I read in the Introduction to bother with the text of Ken Anderson's "Hitler and the Occult".  It was published Down Under and Mr Anderson is an Aussie, if my memory serves me, and I need to upload a page on Mr Bushby, another Aussie whose work is past half-past shoddy.  Plus, what "occult" means to the Christian conspiracist is radically different from that of an agnostic who has studied the writings of occultists with the same skepticism and scrutiny as they apply to everyone else, including Christian conspiracy theorists.

Every source has an agenda, including your subconsciousness.  The more we can recognize our own confirmation biases, among other subconscious agendas, when they arise, we can begin to evolve towards higher intelligence because we have brought what was formerly a subconscious reaction into having had the light of consciousness shown upon it.  This is not an easy task to accomplish, but we must remain skeptical of our own biases and flaws.  With training, we can become more objectively freed from our own biases, and it becomes obvious that the men being interviewed in this video have never discovered their own conscious biases, let alone any biases and agendas in their own subconsciousness.  Let alone the biases and agendas of Darby's Dispensationalism and Scofield's agenda that has created far too many Christian Zionists.  Not all Jews are Zionists, not all Zionists are Jews, but every Zionist is a threat to world peace and the further existence and possible evolution of life on this planet.  These Christian Zionists are even more demented that Jewish Zionists because they want to force Jesus to come back quicker, hence the need to build a temple on the Dome of the Rock to force the fabled second coming, so that he can either convert the Jews or condemn them to hell.

At 25 minutes we hear an equivocating of the Holy Grail and the Anti-Christ!!!  I believe I cover the Holy Grail in Chapter 11 and/or 13 in "My First 100 Days", but I should probably take the time to make a post, or a series of posts concerning where we all can find the four Grail Hallows, and the Holy Grail they symbolized when unified, and we will also see how that relates to what was conveyed in Matthew 6:22 and Luke 11:34 discussed in my last post: "My Ideal of Bible Study."  At the 26th minute, they fail to mention, probably more from ignorance than intentional omission, that the first eugenics laws were enacted in Indiana in 1907.

These people being interviewed seem to have no real understanding of the conditions in Germany in the 1920s.  The conditions mentioned in a six hour documentary: "The Greatest Story Never Told" were the same as I was taught at university in a two semester class of "Europe in the 20th Century," and knowing that context makes it comprehensible how and why the National Socialists were gaining more and more support among the average German.  "Cutting Edge" ministries doesn't seem to be on the cutting edge of historical knowledge, let alone near the skewed Bell-curve that would represent the true "cutting edge".  One of the reasons the Allied propaganda about the NSDAP has never, and seemingly can never cease appears to be the fact that Hitler never broke any of his campaign promises, unlike every politician in the West since World War 2 ended, habitually breaking damn-near every campaign promise they made to get elected.  Another reason that the crony plutocracy must continue the perpetual conditioning and enforce negative reinforcements concerning the NSDAP appears to be in motive of protecting their private greed; if the public evolved beyond the emotional conditioning concerning the NSDAP and began to study the economic model of the NSDAP, especially how the capitalists could only invest their capital in the best interests of all Germanic peoples, we might escape every future recession and depression created artificially to satiate private greed.  The NSDAP economic model would never have allowed the derivatives market in the first place, let alone other aspects of Wall Street that led to the economic collapse of 2008 like "bubble" culture.  The NSDAP would never have bailed out private international bankers, like the US government did - including many multi-million dollar bonuses gained from those bailouts, the same type of bonuses I was taught how to write in a top-ranked undergraduate business school twenty years ago.

Nor do these people being interviewed seem to know that the intent of the user determines whether something is "black" or "white" magic; if it is pursuing selfish interests at the expense of others, it is black magic, if it is in the best interests of the masses, it is white magic.  These are the definitions one can find in studying objective authors of the occult, and these differences were the final two pages of the first book Manly P Hall wrote: "The Initiates of the Flame", nor is Hall the only occult author to make the distinction of selfish versus selfless intent as defining which "color" of magic has been cast.  To those that have objectively studied the life of Hitler and his accession to power, he was not in it for the fame or infamy - his own selfish intent, or lust for power - never seemed to weigh more in his words or actions than the vision he had for all Germanic peoples.  He was the last honest politician that kept his campaign promises, unlike US Presidents and Congressfolk.  If he was practicing any "magic" it was "white" magic because he was only concerned in what was best for Germanic peoples far more than he was interested in any fame, fortune or power or other selfish endeavor.  He considered himself a servant of the volk, looking out for their best interests in direct opposition to what the Occupy Wall Street crowd would call the 1% - the international bankers of the 1920s and 30s, a disproportionate share of whom claim to be of Jewish descent, but not all of them make such claims.  But, it is also interesting to note that the Jewish population of Germany in 1930 was 1% of the total population, so Hitler would support the OWS movement, but OWS never would have been needed in a National Socialist economy because the best interests of the 99% would be the only available outlet for investing the 1%'s capital.

These Christians call William Cooper a "New Age Author" when Cooper claimed to be a Christian many times on his radio broadcasts, but a different enough flavor of Christianity that he was called a "New Age Author" instead of "fellow Christian conspiracy theorist" in this production.  Their confirmation biases based upon the narrow world-view of their conservative Christian thinking prohibits them from the understanding that the vril seems to be the same thing more commonly called the kundalini today, just as this knowledge seems to be the secret of every ancient religion, including much of what Jesus was trying to teach via parables and allegories he never wanted to be taken too literally.

By the 42nd minute, I really wished I could interject just how racist Judaism is with its "chosen" belief, but that would probably only cause cognitive dissonance in them.  But, my biggest indictment against the "Scholarship" of "Cutting Edge Ministries" begins at 43:50 after claiming the German "people would buy into this lie."  Then immediately transit into "But the Bible makes it clear who is the Father of Lies and who is behind the dark forces that drive the likes of Hitler and Himmler."  To try and justify this, the producers immediately reference John 8:44, taking it well out-of-context to fulfill their confirmation biases and eschatology by trying to blame the NSDAP as being the Anti-Christ.  This seems such a problem among most Christians, but they seem to get the habit from their pastors using a few unrelated verses each week to weave some sermon.  What they've isolated from its context seems just as telling as this entire video, not only do they take a Biblical passage well out-of-context, even worse than the quoting from Revelations in the 4th minute.  They quote John 8:44:
"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do.  He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him.  When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it."
To place this back into its original context, like who is Jesus calling "ye" and who do they claim their father to be, we find Jesus is being confronted by those claiming to be the children of Abraham, which Jesus is disputing.  Who would these "children of Abraham" be?  The Jews of Jesus' day, like the Pharisees, Sadducees and Essenes.
39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham.
40 But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham.
41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.
42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me.
43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word.
44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.
46 Which of you convinceth me of sin? And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe me?
47 He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God.
48 Then answered the Jews, and said unto him, Say we not well that thou art a Samaritan, and hast a devil?
49 Jesus answered, I have not a devil; but I honour my Father, and ye do dishonour me.
50 And I seek not mine own glory: there is one that seeketh and judgeth.
51 Verily, verily, I say unto you, If a man keep my saying, he shall never see death.
52 Then said the Jews unto him, Now we know that thou hast a devil. Abraham is dead, and the prophets; and thou sayest, If a man keep my saying, he shall never taste of death.

A true objective student of history knows that most of those claiming to be Jews in the world today are not of Semitic blood, but descend from the Chazar/Khazar kingdom converted to Judaism by its king Bulan, so this chastisement about being the offspring of the father of all lies seems to say more with the context they tried to remove verse 44 from to blame it on the German people believing a lie.  These men believe the lie that the AshkeNAZI Jews, who descend from that Chazar conversion, are Semites that have any claim to the lands of modern Israel because they demonstrate traits of Christian Zionism.

At 47 minutes and 35 seconds, the man glances down at his script to make sure he completed a thought, but if he completed a thought, it was edited out because he uses a bunch of words but none of them were the verb needed for a sentence.  Once again, they try to claim the idea of the super race to Frederick Nietzsche, when it clearly permeates the pages of the Talmud a long time before Nietzsche was born.  I had to laugh and listen several times at 48:53 when the narrator says "magnus opus" instead of the correct "magnum opus".  I have a feeling they were thinking "magus" as in the same as the three "magi" that came to see the birth of Jesus, and that was where he came up with the "magnus", but I also think that helps show why this source should not be accepted as highly credible or of high merits.

I should have made my point already, but if anyone wishes to continue watching the full Christian eschatological propaganda, I only ask that you examine the scripture quoted from Daniel 11 in its actual context.  Is Daniel 11 about the "Anti-Christ", or are they again "scripture-mining" specific passages to justify their confirmation bias?  Is "nor the desire of women" the same thing as do not desire women?  If we read the passage they cite from Daniel with this consideration, it would seem to suggest that one has evolved beyond the desires of women, but really says nothing about whether or not women were still desired.  So, does this verse really say anything about homosexuality?  Or, does it just display the biases that hinder the minds making this video from truly activating all their human potential into genius?

So, if nothing else, and you've watched the video while/after reading this rant, you should have gained a slight glimpse into how my mind works whenever I watch or read something.  I don't just say "If you don't question everything you will know nothing and believe anything" I try to live that philosophy.  Although every source has its own biases and agendas, that doesn't mean that we can't place a hierarchy of credibility among sources.  To do so, though, dictates we become heretical to even those considered heretics by asking questions about why they believe what they believe and trying to figure out who benefits, if anyone, from said belief.  When the sources of greatest merits are in accord, we should consider that data to be valid.  I would not include Cutting Edge Ministries and video makers to be of very high merit, although I am sure they all spoke as honestly as they could from their very limited reality tunnels and confirmation biases.  You can speak honestly and still not be sharing honest truths/facts/data.

Thanks to everyone that bothers to finish anything I have ever written, you deserve a prize!!!
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...